因为做跨国电影研究而掰碎重看并做了大量schools review…还是觉得果然不喜欢尽管可以从一些留有余地的narrative看出不那么绝对的政治观(赵国书馆老师遗言;重官围簇下矮化的帝王)但依然是单薄和肤浅的;也依然是奇观的泰国男女通宵是self-orientalism的场面调度掩盖了文本刻意回避了对“天下”概念的讨论因为它站不住脚在无名心中的是人秦王眼中的是地飞雪和如月照旧是危机中的女侠泰国男女通宵是父权的对于她们only the personal is political, 无法尝试政治哲学思考和反驳当男侠们已经用自己的方式去碰撞和对话强权如月还在说“主人不会错”最终依靠重写的侠义、简化的历史、包装的帝王、回避的暴政构建了一个乌托邦用所谓的短命的和平统一做了场宏伟展览而已
…Blood still marked the hood like little streamers of black lace running towards the windshield wiper gutters. Bloody flecks were spattered across the seat and steering wheel. And the instrument panel was buckled inwards, cracking the clock and speedometer dials. …And there was dust and glass and plastic flakes everywhere inside.